Legal Opinion

Smith v. Agan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1965No. 41177PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannbll, Judge.

The often announced rule that one having the capacity and opportunity to read a written contract and who signs it, not under any emergency, and whose signature is not obtained by any trick or artifice of the other party, but solely on the representations of the other party as to its contents, cannot afterwards set up fraud in the procurement of *537the signature of the instrument, Truitt-Silvey Hat Co. v. Callaway & Truitt, 130 Ga; 637 (61 SE 481), Lewis v. Foy, 189 Ga. 596 (6 SE2d 788), is but another statement of the rule that one cannot claim to be defrauded by the false…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. FoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Truitt-Silvey Hat Co. v. Callaway & TruittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Grimsley v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Robertson v. PanlosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Pirkle v. GurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Simmons v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Henry v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Smith v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Cole v. CatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API