Bruce v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, we address the question whether a request for a continuance by a defendant in a criminal case operates as a waiver of the defendant’s right to a trial within 180 days under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. We hold that a defendant waives the right to a speedy trial under the detainer agreement only if the defendant expressly agrees to or acquiesces in a trial date outside the 180-day time limit. Thus, where the defendant requests a continuance but does not agree to a trial date outside the time limit, the time limit is tolled. Because the defendant…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Medina v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Green v. St. Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Trawick v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.