Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 2006Published

1DissentSaxe, J.

The majority views the separation of *192powers doctrine as precluding the IAS court from affirmatively directing the Legislature to take the specific steps necessary to carry out the previous mandate of the Court of Appeals (see Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 100 NY2d 893, 905 [2003] [CFE II], modfg 295 AD2d 1 [2002], revg 187 Misc 2d 1 [2001]). In this way, it allows a festering constitutional problem of enormous dimension to continue indefinitely.

While it accepts that the shortfall in the funds needed by the New York City public schools in order to provide all its students…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Klostermann v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Wambat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API