Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage v. Celestin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 2009No. 08-CA-691Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADELINE JASMINE, Judge Pro Tempore.

Lin this suit to enforce a promissory note and mortgage via ordinary process, defendant Carey Carter Celestin (Celestin) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). 1 On appeal, Celestin argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because:

1) genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether plaintiff is entitled to litigious redemption;

2) genuine issues of material fact exist and a legitimate dispute as to the exact monetary amount sued for herein and claimed to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sun Belt Constructors v. T & R DRAGLINE SERV., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Pizani v. Progressive Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. OlanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Colonial Mortg. & Loan Corp. v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Valteau v. Mellon Mortg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API