Wells Fargo Home Mortgage v. Celestin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
MADELINE JASMINE, Judge Pro Tempore.
Lin this suit to enforce a promissory note and mortgage via ordinary process, defendant Carey Carter Celestin (Celestin) appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo). 1 On appeal, Celestin argues that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because:
1) genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether plaintiff is entitled to litigious redemption;
2) genuine issues of material fact exist and a legitimate dispute as to the exact monetary amount sued for herein and claimed to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sun Belt Constructors v. T & R DRAGLINE SERV., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Pizani v. Progressive Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. OlanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Colonial Mortg. & Loan Corp. v. JamesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Valteau v. Mellon Mortg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004