Legal Opinion
Rosenkrantz v. Harriet M. Steinberg, P.C.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered February 20, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff leave to amend the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, defendants’ motion granted and plaintiff’s cross motion, insofar as it sought leave to amend, denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.
Contrary to the IAS court’s determination, this Court’s unequivocal finding in Fink Weinberger, P.C. v Rosenkrantz (252 AD2d 368 [1998]),…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Zarin v. Reid & PriestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Alliance Property Management & Development, Inc. v. Andrews Avenue Equities, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Weinberger v. RosenkrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- J-Mar Service Center, Inc. v. Mahoney, Connor & HusseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Ideal Steel Supply Corp. v. BeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Kinberg v. Schwartzapfel, Novick, Truhowsky, Marcus, PCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016