Legal Opinion

Endersbe v. Endersbe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1996No. Civil 960122PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

Jarod Endersbe, the Plaintiff, appealed from the trial court’s Order of Contempt holding him in contempt and sentencing him to a ten day prison term, with all but twenty hours suspended. Jarod claims the trial court abused its discretion when creating the twenty hour sentence because this incarceration is contrary to North Dakota’s contempt of court statute, N.D.C.C. Chapter 27-10 and violates his due process rights. We reverse, in part, and remand.

Jarod and Tanya Endersbe were divorced on January 19, 1995. In the divorce decree, Jarod was ordered to pay Tanya…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Millang v. HahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mid-Dakota Clinic P.C. v. KolsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Montgomery v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API