Legal Opinion

Div. of Tax Appeals v. Ewing Tp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 9, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

72 N.J. Super. 238 (1962)

178 A.2d 229

DIVISION OF TAX APPEALS, CONRAD KUNDL AND LENA KUNDL, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF EWING, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 18, 1961.

Decided February 9, 1962.

Before Judges GAULKIN, KILKENNY and HERBERT.

Mr. A. Jerome Moore argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Edward J. Leadem argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by HERBERT, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

On October 1, 1959 Conrad and Lena Kundl owned 95 1/2 acres of land in Ewing Township. The assessed value placed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hackensack Water Co. v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. City of Newark v. West Milford Tp., Passaic CountySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Trustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  5. Town of Kearny v. Division of Tax Appeals, Department of Taxation & FinanceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Board of Assessment Appeals v. Colorado Arlberg ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Dworman v. Borough of Tinton FallsNew Jersey Tax Court · 1980
  3. In Re Appeal of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Town of West Orange v. Estate of GoldmanNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  5. El Paso County Board of Equalization v. CraddockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API