Legal Opinion

Wileman v. Ladd

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932Published

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The question presented is whether or not there was a breach of the covenant against incumbrances on account of which the plaintiff may maintain this action. It is conceded that a covenant against incumbrances if breached at all is breached when the deed is given. It is also conceded that the covenant is one which runs with the land. Olson v. Lindsay, 190 Wis. 182, 208 N. W. 891. It is equally true that if breached when made, a technical breach of a covenant against incumbrances gives rise only to a cause of action for nominal damages and that no action lies for substantial damages in advance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Killilea v. DouglasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dancy Drainage District v. Hanchett Bond Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Capital City Lumber Co. v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API