Durnin v. Ætna Life Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.
Plaintiff as beneficiary sues on an accident insurance policy. Defendant says, among other things, that prior to the accidental death of the insured the policy had been canceled in accordance with its terms. On that issue a verdict for defendant was directed at the close of the whole case. The following is a fairly complete summary of the facts in evidence:
Wadsworth & Olmstead, Managers- — that being the name and style of the firm as used in the evidence — were the general agents of the defendant. Their office was in Syracuse. They were furnished by defendant with forms of policies and of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Train v. . Holland Purchase Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Cornell v. Travelers' Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Cornell v. . Travelers' Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Kadelburg v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Kadelburg v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fields v. Western Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Soanes v. Empire Blue Cross/Blue ShieldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Klein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938