Legal Opinion

Maulding v. Price's Utility Contractors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 2009No. CA 08-1449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge.

|, Appellant Robert Maulding appeals from the Commission’s opinion affirming and adopting the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ), who found that appellant is not permanently and totally disabled; that he is entitled to a ten-percent permanent anatomical impairment rating; that, for purposes of calculating appellant’s average weekly wages, appellant was not a full-time employee at the time of his injury; and that Cincinnati was entitled to a three-percent offset against future amounts owed for its previous overpayment of benefits. Appellees Price’s Utility…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glass v. EdensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. Hamilton v. Gregory TruckingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Mid-State Construction Co. v. Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Logan County v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cossey v. Pepsi Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  2. Skinner v. Tango Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Murphy v. Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  4. Ark. Dep't of Transportation v. Travis EvansCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API