Legal Opinion

Haberman v. Gotbaum

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 19, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Doris Ling-Cohan, J.

Before the court is the novel issue of whether an artist can *268be evicted because he creates art work in his apartment. This holdover proceeding is predicated on petitioner landlord’s (petitioner) claim that respondent tenant (respondent) has breached his lease in that he is occupying the subject apartment as “an artist’s studio and maintaining and operating a nonresidential and commercial use in the apartment”. (See, notice to cure.) Essentially, the petitioner claims that the respondent is occupying the apartment for commercial and nonresidential use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Park West Village v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Vittorio Properties, Inc. v. AlprinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Ansonia Associates v. BozzaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
  4. Diament v. IsaacsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960
  5. Nissen v. WangCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API