Legal Opinion

Ward v. Mutual Trucking Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By IRVING CARPENTER, J.

Plaintiff in his amended petition says he operated a store in a building owned by himself and wife, at the intersection of two highways; that a truck of the defendant was negligently driven off the road, struck his building causing it to collapse and injure himself and his wife and damaged his stock of goods and his building, for which, including loss of services and expenses for his wife, and loss of business, he claims damages. The answer of the defendant if a general denial of the allegations of the amsnded petition.

To its answer the defendant has appended…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Downie v. NettletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  2. Knight v. Empire Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Looney v. SaltonstallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Wetherbee v. WinchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Sheren v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Hanley Motor Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Home Owners' Service Corp. v. HadleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Schuldt v. Associates Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Sloan v. S. S. Kresge Co.Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas · 1951
  5. Leeper v. NimerSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API