Heburn v. Reynolds
Oneida County Court
Action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.
This action is in foreclosure, and the complaint is in_ about the usual form in such cases, except as it may be modified by the absence of a bond or other per*74sonal security. The defense is somewhat vague, and consists of a denial that the mortgage or document in suit was executed, acknowledged and delivered to the plaintiff as a mortgage ; also that the plaintiff’s claim is outlawed.
Upon the trial of the action the plaintiff offered the mortgage upon which the suit is 'brought in evidence and rested; and the committee did not offer any evidence, resting his case upon several points of law…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hulbert v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Borst v. . CoreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Scofield v. . DoscherNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Thomas v. . HarmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Arkport State Bank v. NutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
- Lovett v. LesslerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Manhattan Savings Bank v. AnnunziatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945