Legal Opinion

Heburn v. Reynolds

Oneida County Court

Decided July 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtHazard, J.

This action is in foreclosure, and the complaint is in_ about the usual form in such cases, except as it may be modified by the absence of a bond or other per*74sonal security. The defense is somewhat vague, and consists of a denial that the mortgage or document in suit was executed, acknowledged and delivered to the plaintiff as a mortgage ; also that the plaintiff’s claim is outlawed.

Upon the trial of the action the plaintiff offered the mortgage upon which the suit is 'brought in evidence and rested; and the committee did not offer any evidence, resting his case upon several points of law…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hulbert v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Barnard v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Borst v. . CoreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Scofield v. . DoscherNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Thomas v. . HarmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hiscock v. HiscockMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Arkport State Bank v. NutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  3. Lovett v. LesslerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  4. Manhattan Savings Bank v. AnnunziatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API