Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thigpen v. Polite

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 21, 1986No. 86-32Published

1DissentDavid Newbern, Justice

The majority opinion notes that the appellees conceded “liability” in this case. It was more than a concession of “negligence.” One of the elements of the tort of negligence is damages. Dean Prosser stated the distinction as follows:

Negligence, as we shall see, is simply one kind of conduct. But a cause of action founded upon negligence, from which liability will follow, requires more than conduct. The traditional formula for the elements necessary to such a cause of action may be stated briefly as follows:

1.....

4. Actual loss or damage resulting to the interests of another. Since the action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Brophy v. John E. Mahaffey & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API