Legal Opinion

State v. Frogge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 2005No. 413A95-3PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

In this case, we review the trial court’s determination that defendant did not receive effective assistance of counsel at his second capital sentencing proceeding. Because we find that defendant’s trial counsel provided adequate assistance under the applicable standards established by the United States Supreme Court, we reverse the trial court and order the reinstatement of defendant’s death sentence.

Defendant Danny Dean Frogge was tried twice for the murders of his father and stepmother. At the first trial, evidence was presented indicating that defendant was living with his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. WaringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Waldrop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Dominique Ray v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API