Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 27, 1991No. 90-1652-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the trial court subjected Steven L. Guzman to an unconstitutional search when the court ordered Guzman to undergo a surprise drug test just prior to Guzman's scheduled sentencing. We hold that the search was reasonable under the state and federal constitutions. We therefore affirm Guzman's conviction and the order denying his application for postconviction relief.

The relevant facts are straightforward and not in dispute. On January 23,1989, the state charged Guzman as a party to the crime of unlawfully delivering a controlled substance, pursuant to secs.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  3. State v. GuzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API