Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Carstens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county, denying petitioner’s application pursuant to section 19 of the Decedent Estate Law for the enforcement of a compromise agreement and directing the entry of a decree in conformity therewith reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, payable by the respondents out of the compromise sum. The meeting of the minds of the parties is evidenced by the written stipulation, and the proceeding pursuant to section 19 of the Decedent Estate Law was properly based thereon. Such a motion might be denied in a…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of CalascioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API