Latsch v. Bethke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The defendant demurs upon seven grounds. Substantially all of the questions argued can be considered under the first ground: That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the seventh ground: That the action was not commenced within the time limited by law. The defendant contends that in order to state a cause of action it should have been *488averred, first, that the subject matter of the action, an undivided one-half interest in the Latsch note and mortgage, was included in the inventory of the estate of Louis Bethke, deceased; second, that the final…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Supervisors v. Mineral Point RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- McKenney v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Jones v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Northwestern Securities Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of LeFeber v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Richardson v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Lindsay v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Qualley v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.