Legal Opinion

Latsch v. Bethke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The defendant demurs upon seven grounds. Substantially all of the questions argued can be considered under the first ground: That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the seventh ground: That the action was not commenced within the time limited by law. The defendant contends that in order to state a cause of action it should have been *488averred, first, that the subject matter of the action, an undivided one-half interest in the Latsch note and mortgage, was included in the inventory of the estate of Louis Bethke, deceased; second, that the final…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Supervisors v. Mineral Point RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  2. McKenney v. MinahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Jones v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. Northwestern Securities Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of LeFeber v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Central Wisconsin Trust Co. v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Richardson v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Lindsay v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Qualley v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API