Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mbmobandum : The decision on the appeal should be withheld and the case remitted to the court at Special Term for further development of the record. On the argument of the appeal, third-party plaintiff-respondent Equitable offered for consideration by this court in the first instance transcripts of examinations before trial of third-party defendant Michigan Tool. On their face these transcripts seem to suggest that third-party defendant had done some business' in New York. No opportunity to amplify by other proof or explain the total effect of its activities in New York has been afforded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. In Re the Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd. v. DaleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Impex Metals Corp. v. OREMET CHEMICAL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. Johnson v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOC'Y OF THE UNITED STATESNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API