Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway v. Cotton
Hawaii Supreme Court
Error to Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
PREAR, C.J.
The facts are stated somewhat fully in the decision on the motion to quash, ante, p. 374. Briefly, the defendants, after a verdict against them, moved for a new trial but failed to file the requisite bond within ten days after verdict as required by statute. The trial judge, Gear, holding that the ten days'ran from judgment and not from verdict, allowed judgment to be ■entered and the bond filed after the expiration of the ten days from verdict but within ten days from judgment and heard the motion. He did not decide it, however, until the second term of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Ohms v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Woolfolk v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
- Bass v. SwingleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cotton v. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1908