Legal Opinion

The People v. Michael Thomas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2019No. 5Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 5 The People &c., Appellant, v. Michael Thomas, Respondent. Jean M. Joyce, for appellant. Melissa S. Horlick, for respondent. STEIN, J.: The issue on this appeal is whether a resentence on a prior conviction—imposed after the original sentence is vacated as illegal—resets the date of sentencing for purposes of determining a defendant’s predicate felony status. We hold that the date on which -1- -2- No. 5 sentence was first imposed upon a prior…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. NievesNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API