Legal Opinion

Ex Parte City of Robertsdale

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 23, 1988No. 87-669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We issued the writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals to review its decision applying our recent opinion in Ex parte City of Leeds,473 So.2d 1060 (Ala. 1985). We reverse and remand with directions.

Petitioners urge us to overrule Ex parte City of Leeds, because, they say, it was wrongly decided. They claim evidence that it was wrongly decided can be found in the fact that the legislature, immediately after the decision, amended the Code section that was the basis for the Court's decision and, in effect, adopted the dissent's reasoning as to the intention of the legislature.

Ex parte…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City of LeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. City of Robertsdale v. Baldwin CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STATE DEPT. OF REV. v. Taft Coal Sales and Associates, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. DICKSON CAMPERS, INC. v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. City of Robertsdale v. Baldwin CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. DICKSON CAMPERS, INC. v. City of MobileCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API