Legal Opinion

Yellow Cab Corp. v. Korpeck

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for temporary injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

All of the defendants’ yellow cabs appeared upon the streets of the city after the plaintiff popularized the use of that style of cab. The defendants’ cabs complained of are all substantially of the same color scheme and dress as the plaintiff’s yellow cabs. Cabs painted yellow or striped yellow or otherwise having yellow in their makeup may have appeared on the streets of the city many years ago but none of them had the distinctive color scheme and dress of plaintiff’s cabs. The complaint in this action is not that yellow is used by the defendants on their cabs but that it is used in such a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White Studio, Inc. v. DreyfoosNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. American Yellow Taxi Operators, Inc. v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. N. Y. Cab Co. v. MooneyNew York Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Black & White & Town Taxis, Inc. v. MinezelesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Triangle Mechanical Laboratories Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933
  2. D., L. W.R.R. Co. v. Lackawanna, C., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Seattle Taxicab Co. v. De JarlaisWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Vélez Posada v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
  5. Vélez Posada v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API