Legal Opinion

Pingry v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1845PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This was an action of covenant for the non-payment of rent. The plaintiff declared, that,-on the 13th day of February, 1833, he, with his then wife, Rebecca Pingry, executed to Charles W. Watkins, his heirs and assigns, for and during the natural life of the said Rebecca, a lease of certain premises in Chester, in the •county of Windsor, reserving an annual rent of $42,50, payable on the first day of April in each year during the said term ; that said Charles W. Watkins…

Read the full summary

This was an action of covenant for the non-payment of rent. The plaintiff declared, that,-on the 13th day of February, 1833, he, with his then wife, Rebecca Pingry, executed to Charles W. Watkins, his heirs and assigns, for and during the natural life of the said Rebecca, a lease of certain premises in Chester, in the •county of Windsor, reserving an annual rent of $42,50, payable on the first day of April in each year during the said term ; that said Charles W. Watkins entered into possession of the premises; that on the 8th day of February, 1840, all the estate, right, interest, &c., of the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BenNett, J.

This ease was before the Supreme Court, upon a bill of exceptions, in 1843, and most of the questions saved by this bill of exceptions were then disposed of, and are not open to farther *386argument. The legal construction of the lease was then settled. See 15 Vt. 479.

It is now claimed in argument, that there was error in the county court, in rejecting the deposition of Charlea W. W atkins, and that that was proper evidence to explain and give construction to the quitclaim deed from the deponent to the defendant. Bat there was no latent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pingrey v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chowchilla Farms Inc. v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. Paige v. Rocky Ford Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Smith v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
  5. Kinnear & Gager Manufacturing Co. v. MinerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API