Legal Opinion
People v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.
Defendant’s contention that the jury’s verdict is against the weight of the evidence is unpersuasive. We have reviewed the trial evidence, including the testimony of the victims, their mother, the police investigators, the medical staff at Planned Parenthood and the forensic scientist who conducted DNA analysis of the aborted fetus, which resulted in a 99.99% probability that defendant was the father, and have weighed it against defendant’s testimony that he never had sexual contact with the victims. Viewing all of the evidence in a neutral light and according deference to the jury’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LaBargeNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. ShofkomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. KruppenbacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. PolancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RaucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. RaucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SorrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013