Legal Opinion

Strotsky v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort arising out of a collision between an automobile, operated by the plaintiff, and a street car of the defendant. At the close of the evidence the defendant filed a motion that upon all the evidence a verdict be directed for the defendant. The motion was denied; the defendant duly excepted; the case was submitted to the jury and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

The evidence contained in the record in its aspect most favorable to the plaintiff's contentions warranted the finding of facts in substance as follows: The accident occurred *530on December 25, 1931,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ducharme v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Larkin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Gibson v. Union Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marturano v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API