Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Nemenyi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Not only was there no proof identifying the defect in the stool, from which plaintiff fell, and establishing that such defect was the proximate cause of the fall, but there was no showing of “facts and conditions from which the negligence of the defendant and the causation of the accident by that negligence may be reasonably inferred” (Ingersoll v Liberty Bank, 278 NY 1,7; see Agnelli v Tonegatti, 20 AD2d 887).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. Liberty Bank of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Agnelli v. TonegattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Putnick v. H.M.C. AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Covelli v. Long Island Lighting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API