Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney General v. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Benevolent Ass'n

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Quo WARRANTO. .

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This is an original proceeding, instituted for the purpose of ousting defendants from transacting the business of life insurance.

The information alleges in substance that defendant association is now and has been for some time transacting the business of life insurance within the state, and issuing policies or certificates of insurance upon the lives of persons within the state. That it has not complied with the *277laws of the state relating to the transaction of the business ■of life insurance, and has not at any time obtained a certificate from the auditor of the state permitting it to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. State v. Bankers' & Merchants' Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Arthur v. Odd Fellows Beneficial Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Schunck v. Gegenseitiger Wittwen und Waisen FondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  5. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Northwestern Mutual Live Stock Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rockhold v. Canton Masonic Mutual Benevolent SocietyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. HeadleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Chartrand v. BraceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. National Union v. MarlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  5. Swenson v. ChristofersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API