Legal Opinion

Dean v. Bassett

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,421PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. TIeacock, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court :

The Court instructed the jury:

“ The acts of an agent can be ratified only after full knowledge of those acts, and the principal must know the character of the acts to be ratified, otherwise a ratification is void. If a ratification be made under misapprehension of the full scope of acts, it is voidable to the extent of the mistakes, and the party can be relieved so far as there was a mistake to the act.”

The comment of appellant’s counsel is:

“ The second clause of the instruction informs the jury to the effect that if Mrs. Bassett was under a misapprehension as to any of these…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Halsey v. MorteiroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Oxford Lake Line v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Shull v. New Birdsall Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Hengehold v. National Creamery & Produce Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API