Legal Opinion

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 19, 2015No. 12-14611PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This court previously determined the State of Alabama failed to sufficiently justify its decision to impose certain taxes on rail carriers, including CSX Transportation, Inc., when motor carriers and water carriers (both railroad competitors) are not subject to the same. See CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of Revenue, 720 F.3d 863 (11th Cir.2013). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded, concluding that we should reconsider whether the State has offered sufficient justification — through the imposition of an alternative, comparable tax or otherwise— for exempting railroad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alabama Dept. of Revenue v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of RevenueDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2017
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Alabama Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. BNSF Railway Company v. Alabama Department of RevenueDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API