Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Coppieters

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1902No. S.F. No. 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

This action was brought by plaintiff for the negligent killing of her son by defendants while said son was at work as a plumber in the Call Building on the thirtieth day of September, 1897. The son was at work in a certain shaft at the rear of the elevator shaft on the second floor. In the same shaft, above, at about the seventeenth floor, an employee of appellants named Johnson was engaged in fastening an iron ladder in place by means of iron anchors, and the evidence indicates that it was by Johnson dropping one of these anchors down the open shaft that the son came to his death.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCreery v. EverdingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Jones v. SpearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westman v. Clifton's Brookdale, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Armstrong v. New La Paz Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Chase v. Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Boston Foundry Company v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API