Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Yost

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 18, 2019No. Case No.1:19-CV-00118-MRBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. BACKGROUND

a. The Act

Ohio Senate Bill 145 (S.B. 145 or the Act), 132nd General Assembly (Ohio 2018) (codified at Ohio Rev. Code § 2919.15 ) was signed into law on December 21, 2018. The Act criminalizes, as of March 22, 2019, the performance of "dismemberment abortions." It states that:

[n]o person shall knowingly perform or attempt to perform a dismemberment abortion when the dismemberment abortion is not necessary, in reasonable medical judgment, to preserve the life or physical health of the mother as a result of the mother's life or physical health being endangered by a serious risk of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Eric FriedlanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Bernard v. Individual Members of the Ind. Med. Licensing Bd.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2019
  3. Berger v. National Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  4. Hopkins v. JegleyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API