State v. Coleman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtJacobus, J.
This is an appeal by the State of Florida challenging the trial court’s order suppressing incriminating statements made by the defendant below, Scott Coleman. We reverse.
*583In granting suppression, the trial court found that the Miranda1 warning read to Coleman was defective under State v. Powell, 998 So.2d 531 (Fla.2008), since it did not specifically advise Coleman that he had the right to speak with an attorney during police questioning. However, some months after the trial court’s decision in this case, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Powell.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.