Legal Opinion

Carberry v. Carberry

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 9, 1945No. Docket 148/355PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The alleged grievance of the complainant can be concisely stated. His bill charges that he was married to his present wife, the defendant Alice C. Carberry, on May 17th, 1938, and that on June 14th, 1943, they purchased a parcel of real estate known as No. 168 Matilda Avenue, in the Township of Franklin, Somerset County, with funds supplied by each of them. With his approval the title was taken in the name of his wife. On December 7th, 1944, he joined with his wife in the execution of a deed conveying the premises to the defendant Thomas Richardson upon the assurance of his wife that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  2. Wharton v. StoutenburghSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1882
  3. Orange Society v. KonskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  4. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Austin v. YoungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Becchelli v. BecchelliArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Becchelli v. BecchelliArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Huston v. HustonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Huston v. HustonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API