United States v. Reddest
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Leroy Reddest appeals his convictions of five counts of sexual abuse. Reddest argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s determination on count IV (that he digitally penetrated the victim’s genital opening) and that the district court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on all five counts. We reverse Reddest’s conviction on count IV, and we affirm his convictions on the remaining counts.
I
Consistent with our standard of review, the following facts are described in the light most favorable to the verdict. United States v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dakota Industries, Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Leo Plenty Arrows, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. David RomanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Willie Christopher JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kevin Lee Davis, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. StarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BirdineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. White BullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.