Legal Opinion

Foothill Federal Credit Union v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 2007No. B198664PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZELON, J.

Edwin A., Janet, Jill, Amy, and Melissa King sued Foothill Federal Credit Union (FFCU) for, inter alia, invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress, claiming that FFCU produced consumer records beyond the scope of a subpoena that had been narrowed. FFCU demurred to these causes of action on the basis of the litigation privilege (Civ. Code, § 47) as a complete bar to the causes of action, and the trial court overruled the demurrers. We grant FFCU’s petition for writ of mandate because the litigation privilege bars real parties in interest’s claims.

FACTUA…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Lantz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK DBA CHASE MANHATT.District Court, E.D. California · 2008
  2. Tom Jones Enterprises, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Pub. Guardian of the Cnty. of San Luis Obispo v. S.A. (In re S.A.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. A-Ju Tours v. Alleghany Corp. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Board of Registered Nursing v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API