Legal Opinion

Keck v. Harris

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 22, 2004No. S03A1425PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

Appellant Richard Paul Keck brought a complaint for modification of child support and visitation, and in connection therewith sought a determination from the trial court that Georgia’s Child Support Guidelines, OCGA § 19-6-15, is invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, U. S. Const., Art. VI. The case is before the Court from the grant of discretionary review of an order upholding the constitutionality of the guidelines on all grounds asserted. We affirm.

1. The trial court’s order does not constitute a final judgment, as the claim for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Horne v. DrachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  2. MAGISTRATE COURT DEKALB COUNTY v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. MAGISTRATE COURT DEKALB COUNTY v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API