Monette v. Trummer
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
On these facts, we agree with the Appellate Division majority that defendant dealer satisfied its initial burden of proving that it was not an owner of the vehicle in question under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 128. Plaintiffs failed to raise a genuine issue of fact to support a contrary finding.
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Graham v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Walker v. Town of WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Moll v. GriffithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Maguire v. Upstate Auto, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Stanley v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.