Legal Opinion

(PC) Kyle v. Los Angeles Police Department

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 10, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01720Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONTA LADEAL KYLE, No. 2:19-cv-1720 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 19 has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 21 Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915. “A district court may deny…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.