People v. Ardito
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carro, J.
We are substantially in agreement with the statement of the facts set forth by Justice Bloom in his dissent, as we are with his conclusions on matters other than whether a prima facie case of a conspiracy to commit criminal usury was established. We find that the prosecution never established, prima facie, the existence of that conspiracy without recourse to the challenged statements. Therefore, the *145out-of-court declarations of Tutino, the alleged coconspirator and accomplice, to the witness Sanchez, made out of the presence of appellant, were never rendered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SalkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. LucianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- People v. RastelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. AlwadishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. ArditoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. EliasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.