Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Overhead Door Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 8, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 88-9447PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This diversity action was initiated in December of 1988. Plaintiff, a member of the armed forces reserves, seeks recovery' from Overhead Door Corporation (“Overhead”) and General Motors Corporation (“GM”), for injuries sustained while working at the Willow Grove Naval Air Station. According to the complaint, plaintiff was attempting to repair a door manufactured by Overhead, which had been installed in a van manufactured by GM, when he was struck by a wrench, severely injuring his right eye. Complaint, First Count, ¶¶ 4-5; Fourth Count, 1f 3.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch And Signal DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Terrence K. v. United States Department of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ilan-Gat Engineers, Ltd., a.g./s.a. v. Antigua International BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Lis v. Robert Packer HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
3Cited by13 opinions
- Miller v. New Jersey Transit Authority Rail OperationsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- ALVARADO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Anaya v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Anaya v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Cleo Investments, LLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.