Legal Opinion · Dissent

State, Ex Rel. Red Carpet Kamms, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1988No. 54688Published

1DissentPatton, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s issuance of a writ of mandamus.

Relator seeks an order from this court which would prevent the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections from counting the votes of the electorate in the local-option election regarding relator’s liquor permit. An action in mandamus, however, does not lie.

In State, ex rel. Byrd, v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Elections (1981), 65 Ohio St. 2d 40, 19 O.O. 3d 230, 417 N.E. 2d 1375, the Supreme Court held in paragraph one of the syllabus:

“Mandamus and quo warranto will not lie to compel the withdrawal of a certificate of election…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Byrd v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Daoust v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Walt's Friendly Tavern v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API