Legal Opinion

Hervey v. Parry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 8952PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Marshall Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

This was a suit for foreclosure by the assignee of a mortgage against the mortgagors and a junior encumbrancer.

Matilda Parry and one Swanback exchanged farms. Charles F. Parry, the husband of Matilda, was her agent in making-the exchange. The Parrys gave Swanback two notes to boot,, and secured the notes by a mortgage; the notes and mortgage were assigned by Swanback to the appellant, who brought this suit thereupon against the appellees.

The junior encumbrancer was defaulted; no question arises-as to him.

Parry and wife answered jointly, admitting the execution and assignment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Kennedy v. RichardsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis R. W. Co. v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hutts v. HuttsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Elliott v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Magnuson v. BillingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Graves v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Frank v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API