Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 12, 1988No. 88-224PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This is an appeal from the special chancellor’s finding that appellee’s unliquidated personal injury claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) was not marital property under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-315(b)(6) (Supp. 1987). In her appeal, the appellant relies on our earlier opinion in Bunt v. Bunt, 294 Ark. 507, 744 S.W.2d 718 (1988), in arguing that the chancellor’s finding is erroneous. We agree to the extent that part of the appellee’s claim should be considered marital property, and therefore reverse and remand.

The parties were married on May 6, 1980, and they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Bunt v. BuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Noble v. NobleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDermott v. McDermottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Skelton v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Mason v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Marsh v. MarshCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API