Legal Opinion

Ganci v. Rubino

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLewis W. Olliffe, J.

Third-party defendant, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Incorporated, hereinafter referred to as du Pont, moves, pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil *737Practice, to dismiss for insufficiency the amended and supplemental third-party complaint against it.

The original plaintiffs’ amended and supplemental complaint (hereinafter referred to as the Main Complaint) seeks to recover for damages arising from injury and death of the infant plaintiff, allegedly resulting from said plaintiff’s exposure to an insecticide known as “No. 49 ” manufactured and distributed by the third-party plaintiffs.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ganci v. RubinoNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API