Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Alexander

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil action, tried before Gudger, Judge, and a jury, at Spring Term, 1886, of Washington Superior Court. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. The facts fully appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

Under proceedings instituted by the Solicitor in the Superior Court of Washington county, upon the bond executed by the defendant S. M. Alexander, as guardian of one Ephraim Mann, and .Jesse Norman, the surety thereon, the estates and effects held in trust were delivered to the clerk of said Court, who was appointed a receiver for that purpose. Among the assets was a note executed by Mary Spruill to said Alexander, as guardian, on January 3d, 1869, for $1,515, transferred to the receiver at its full value. This debt had been secured to the said Alexander by a mortgage of lands lying in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Brown v. PikeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dixie Fire Insurance Co. v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Insurance Co. v. . Bonding Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Martin v. Buffaloe.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. McNeill v. . CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Chairman v. . ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API