Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Unemancipated Minor Child
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 17, 1996No. Magistrate CY-96-1454A-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH
WHALEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion to Quash Subpoena (Ct.Rec. 2 (sealed)), which was filed on behalf of the Unemancipated Minor Child 1 and heard with oral argument and an evidentiary healing on December 3 and 4, 1996. The motion seeks to quash a subpoena ad testificandum, commanding the Uneman-cipated Minor Child’s testimony before the grand jury, on the grounds of a parent-child privilege.
Background
By means of a subpoena ad testificandum, the Unemancipated Minor Child was commanded to testify before the grand jury. The Unemancipated Minor Child…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Red ElkDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1997
- Under Seal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Under Seal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014