Legal Opinion

McWilliams v. Stackhouse

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1924No. 8704PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Plaintiff claims damages ex contractu from defendant under an agreement forming part of a certain written offer, made by defendant, for the purchase of real estate from a third party. The perti*254nent clause in the agreement reads as follows:

“In case I fail to comply with'above offer, if accepted, I agree to pay all the loss and damage the said R. McWilliams may sustain by my failure to comply with my agreement and also attorney’s fees which the said R. McWilliams may incur in suit to recover said loss and damage.”

The facts in this case conclusively establish that defendant did refuse to comply…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Probst v. Di GiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  2. Blache v. GoodierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Brugier v. RitchieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Matthews-Pelton, Inc. v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Carrere's Sons v. EdstromLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API