Legal Opinion

Seaboard MacHinery Corporation (Of Delaware) v. Seaboard MacHinery Corporation (Of New Jersey)

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 26, 1959No. 24843_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action the district judge, after trial and verdict, has given judgment for the plaintiffs on two counts of the complaint, and dismissed another, while he has retained four counts and a counterclaim for later trial. He has made a finding that there is no just reason for delay, and has directed final judgment on the three counts upon which he has acted. This provides the formal basis for immediate appeal under F.R. 54(b) as amended, and defendants accordingly have appealed the judgment entered against them. Nevertheless it is well settled that the rule is available only in case of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, Walter J. Tuohy, and Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Adler v. KlawansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. East v. GilchristCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Acumen Re Management Corp. v. General Security National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  4. Henderson v. HassurCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1977
  5. Canterbury Riding Condominium v. Chesapeake Investors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API