Holloway-Johnson v. Beall
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
By virtue of an at least partially successful suit on the merits, the appellant is in position to recover $200,000 in damages. The appellant’s aspiration, however, is to recover three and a half million dollars in damages. What stands between the already captured bird in the hand and the still elusive second bird in the bush is a statutory damages cap. The dominant issue on this appeal concerns the appellant’s effort to dissolve that statutory barrier by persuading us that it has somehow been waived. That effort, however, is undermined by a misdirected focus on the wrong question. The…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Beall v. Holloway-JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Rounds v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Royster v. GahlerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- 1st Team Fitness, LLC v. IllianoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.